This is the second part of the introduction to the CHIPS model of Christian case-making. Read the first part here.
All aspects of apologetics - every positive case and every objection - essentially asks one or more of the following five questions: Is the Bible sufficiently…
1) Comprehendible?
“Is it something I can comprehend?”
2) Historical?
“Is it an accurate reflection of historical events?”
3) Interpreted?
“Is it a proper interpretation of what the author meant to say?”
4) Preserved?
“Is it an adequate preservation of the original composition?”
5) Significant?
“Is it significant for my own life?”
SO WHY FIVE?
How can we be so sure every case made in favor of Christianity and all challenges fall into these five categories? Could there be more? The way we can be confident in this is by familiarizing ourselves with the adventures of Christianity over the last 2,000 years. We know these five categories are sufficient because those are the only ones that have been raised. It’s certainly possible for a new critic to come up with a challenge never thought of before, but it’s not likely. As much as the “new atheists” trend gives it a fresh face, critics of Christianity are nothing new and neither are their arguments.
