Full MP3 Audio here (HT: Brian Auten)
Dan Grossenbach also wrote a post debate review here.
Sean's contention during the debate was that God is in fact the best explanation for moral values. If there is no God there is no moral law-giver and hence no transcendent moral law which we can appeal to. In other words, without God we have no grounding or foundation for objective morality. We are left with mere subjective opinion.
It was not until late in the debate that Corbett actually offered an alternative explanation for the existence of objective moral values. Like many skeptics, Corbett finally appealed to evolution as an explanation for morality. But does this work?
